Are you looking for love in Minnesota?
Or are you just hoping to hook up with a hot Minnesotan?
Either way, we’ve got you covered here.
If you live in Minnesota, there’s a pretty good chance there are a lot of singles in your area. The North Star State has plenty of people over 18 who aren’t married or in a serious relationship.
That’s great news for people who are single and looking to mingle.
So, where are the best cities for singles in Minnesota? We used Saturday Night Science to find out.
Table Of Contents: Top Ten | Methodology | Summary | Table
The 10 Best Cities For Singles In Minnesota For 2024
So, what was the best city for singles in Minnesota? Minneapolis ranks as the best place for singles in Minnesota if you care about things singles care about, like nightlife, affordable housing, and other singles.
Read below to see how we crunched the numbers and how each city ranked. If you live in or are close to one of these cities and are single, you should probably get out more often.
Just saying.
For more Minnesota reading, check out:
- Best Places To Live In Minnesota
- Cheapest Places To Live In Minnesota
- Most Dangerous Cities In Minnesota
The 10 Best Cities For Singles In Minnesota For 2024
/10
Population: 426,877
Median Age: 32.8
Married households: 14.0%
Households with kids: 21.8%
More on Minneapolis: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living | Real Estate
I used to love to visit Minneapolis/St. Paul. The city was clean and well-lit, the people were friendly and willing to help, and I did not feel uneasy while walking about the city.
Recently, an influx of Somalian ‘refugees’ flooded into the city/metroplex. These ‘refugees’ have destroyed many areas of the once beautiful city; turning them into slums and crime ridden areas. These people also cause civil disturbance and make visitors feel uncomfortable and add a sense of danger while visiting.
/10
Population: 44,444
Median Age: 26.5
Married households: 21.0%
Households with kids: 23.2%
More on Mankato: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living | Real Estate
/10
Population: 308,806
Median Age: 33.1
Married households: 15.0%
Households with kids: 28.4%
More on St. Paul: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living | Real Estate
The weather s***s! It’s now May, and we have snow up north-! Winters are freezing cold, summers are super hot with mosquitoes, the State bird! Taxes are ridiculous and the roads have potholes the size of Texas!
Stillwater is a beautiful city on the river, with lots of cute shops and restaurants, which is worth your trip!
/10
Population: 36,809
Median Age: 38.2
Married households: 23.0%
Households with kids: 23.1%
More on Richfield: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living | Real Estate
/10
Population: 33,109
Median Age: 32.4
Married households: 16.0%
Households with kids: 37.2%
More on Brooklyn Center: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living | Real Estate
/10
Population: 29,731
Median Age: 34.7
Married households: 23.0%
Households with kids: 29.9%
More on Fridley: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living | Real Estate
/10
Population: 21,822
Median Age: 37.2
Married households: 18.0%
Households with kids: 25.7%
More on Columbia Heights: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living | Real Estate
/10
Population: 44,443
Median Age: 31.0
Married households: 19.0%
Households with kids: 29.3%
More on Moorhead: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living | Real Estate
/10
Population: 18,752
Median Age: 35.2
Married households: 18.0%
Households with kids: 24.5%
More on Hopkins: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living | Real Estate
/10
Population: 68,910
Median Age: 30.3
Married households: 21.0%
Households with kids: 28.2%
More on St. Cloud: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living | Real Estate
Methodology: How do you determine which city is best for singles in Minnesota anyways?
To give you the places in Minnesota which are best for singles to find one another, we used Saturday Night Science to look at a handful of metrics. Of course, we want to measure the type of people who live in each city and make some assumptions about what single people like.
So we researched the internet for a database that contains all that information.
We threw a lot of criteria at this one to get the best, most complete results possible. Using the 2018-2022 American Community Survey Census data produced for the state of Minnesota, we looked at every single city in the state. We paid particular attention to:
- Population density
- % of population that’s male vs. female (closer to a 50-50 ratio is better)
- % of households with kids
- Median age
- Number of unmarried people in each city
We then gave each city a “Singles Score.”
The higher the score, the better the city is for singles to find one another. We also limited our results to cities with over 10,000 people. For Minnesota, that meant a total of 99 cities.
We updated this article for 2024. This is our tenth time ranking the best cities for singles in Minnesota.
Read on to see why Minneapolis is the talk of the town while Ham Lake is probably a bit on the bland side.
Summary: The Best Cities for Singles in Minnesota for 2024
If you’re looking for a breakdown of cities in Minnesota ranked by criteria that most agree make a place a great spot for finding a single person (and potentially love), this is an accurate list.
The best cities for singles in Minnesota are Minneapolis, Mankato, St. Paul, Richfield, Brooklyn Center, Fridley, Columbia Heights, Moorhead, Hopkins, and St. Cloud.
Here’s a look at the most boring cities in Minnesota according to the data:
- Ham Lake
- Lino Lakes
- St. Michael
For more Minnesota reading, check out:
- Best Places To Raise A Family In Minnesota
- Safest Places In Minnesota
- Worst Places To Live In Minnesota
Best Cities For Singles In Minnesota
Rank | City | Population | Median Age | % Married Households | % Households /w Kids |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Minneapolis, MN | 426,877 | 32.8 | 14.0% | 21.8% |
2 | Mankato, MN | 44,444 | 26.5 | 21.0% | 23.2% |
3 | St. Paul, MN | 308,806 | 33.1 | 15.0% | 28.4% |
4 | Richfield, MN | 36,809 | 38.2 | 23.0% | 23.1% |
5 | Brooklyn Center, MN | 33,109 | 32.4 | 16.0% | 37.2% |
6 | Fridley, MN | 29,731 | 34.7 | 23.0% | 29.9% |
7 | Columbia Heights, MN | 21,822 | 37.2 | 18.0% | 25.7% |
8 | Moorhead, MN | 44,443 | 31.0 | 19.0% | 29.3% |
9 | Hopkins, MN | 18,752 | 35.2 | 18.0% | 24.5% |
10 | St. Cloud, MN | 68,910 | 30.3 | 21.0% | 28.2% |
11 | North St. Paul, MN | 12,465 | 32.1 | 24.0% | 30.9% |
12 | St. Louis Park, MN | 49,500 | 36.0 | 23.0% | 19.9% |
13 | Duluth, MN | 86,772 | 34.7 | 25.0% | 22.3% |
14 | Northfield, MN | 20,518 | 29.4 | 19.0% | 26.8% |
15 | Worthington, MN | 13,838 | 33.1 | 15.0% | 35.8% |
16 | Bemidji, MN | 15,441 | 29.1 | 17.0% | 23.4% |
17 | Winona, MN | 26,083 | 30.7 | 18.0% | 15.3% |
18 | South St. Paul, MN | 20,598 | 36.9 | 27.0% | 30.4% |
19 | Brooklyn Park, MN | 84,951 | 35.2 | 18.0% | 38.1% |
20 | Robbinsdale, MN | 14,452 | 38.9 | 25.0% | 26.3% |
21 | Burnsville, MN | 64,075 | 37.2 | 22.0% | 28.4% |
22 | Rochester, MN | 120,848 | 36.3 | 22.0% | 29.4% |
23 | Maplewood, MN | 41,405 | 39.2 | 25.0% | 28.1% |
24 | Crystal, MN | 22,954 | 37.5 | 26.0% | 25.8% |
25 | Coon Rapids, MN | 63,296 | 39.2 | 28.0% | 30.4% |
26 | Mounds View, MN | 13,100 | 36.9 | 30.0% | 32.5% |
27 | St. Peter, MN | 12,039 | 34.3 | 22.0% | 27.8% |
28 | Little Canada, MN | 10,624 | 41.3 | 24.0% | 24.1% |
29 | West St. Paul, MN | 20,820 | 38.9 | 25.0% | 22.8% |
30 | Eagan, MN | 68,262 | 38.7 | 28.0% | 30.8% |
31 | Austin, MN | 26,156 | 37.0 | 27.0% | 32.4% |
32 | New Brighton, MN | 23,141 | 37.2 | 27.0% | 30.9% |
33 | Bloomington, MN | 89,244 | 41.8 | 27.0% | 24.6% |
34 | Roseville, MN | 36,066 | 41.2 | 28.0% | 22.0% |
35 | New Hope, MN | 21,620 | 41.4 | 22.0% | 28.5% |
36 | Minnetonka, MN | 53,529 | 42.5 | 29.0% | 26.5% |
37 | Woodbury, MN | 75,549 | 38.0 | 27.0% | 37.6% |
38 | Apple Valley, MN | 55,594 | 37.6 | 25.0% | 34.3% |
39 | White Bear Lake, MN | 24,317 | 42.0 | 32.0% | 27.8% |
40 | Anoka, MN | 17,892 | 40.1 | 31.0% | 31.4% |
41 | Oakdale, MN | 28,029 | 41.0 | 30.0% | 28.8% |
42 | Blaine, MN | 70,047 | 37.6 | 32.0% | 37.2% |
43 | Owatonna, MN | 26,400 | 40.0 | 35.0% | 29.9% |
44 | Stillwater, MN | 19,316 | 41.8 | 32.0% | 30.6% |
45 | Willmar, MN | 21,006 | 36.4 | 26.0% | 29.6% |
46 | Sartell, MN | 19,382 | 32.9 | 34.0% | 36.0% |
47 | Sauk Rapids, MN | 13,830 | 34.5 | 35.0% | 33.4% |
48 | Brainerd, MN | 14,412 | 36.0 | 26.0% | 26.6% |
49 | Monticello, MN | 14,447 | 34.1 | 34.0% | 38.4% |
50 | Edina, MN | 53,037 | 44.8 | 27.0% | 27.6% |
51 | Waconia, MN | 12,993 | 36.9 | 37.0% | 41.6% |
52 | Red Wing, MN | 16,627 | 42.4 | 32.0% | 23.9% |
53 | Chanhassen, MN | 25,868 | 40.6 | 28.0% | 34.5% |
54 | Hutchinson, MN | 14,588 | 41.9 | 36.0% | 22.2% |
55 | Golden Valley, MN | 22,142 | 45.8 | 27.0% | 23.3% |
56 | Plymouth, MN | 79,918 | 40.7 | 28.0% | 32.3% |
57 | Farmington, MN | 23,487 | 35.1 | 32.0% | 46.8% |
58 | Hibbing, MN | 16,167 | 42.5 | 34.0% | 22.3% |
59 | Eden Prairie, MN | 63,623 | 39.5 | 25.0% | 36.2% |
60 | Shakopee, MN | 44,135 | 35.0 | 25.0% | 44.2% |
61 | Alexandria, MN | 14,400 | 37.9 | 31.0% | 24.6% |
62 | Fairmont, MN | 10,411 | 46.0 | 35.0% | 23.4% |
63 | Albert Lea, MN | 18,434 | 44.2 | 27.0% | 26.6% |
64 | Marshall, MN | 13,647 | 34.7 | 30.0% | 31.4% |
65 | Faribault, MN | 24,418 | 38.7 | 23.0% | 31.2% |
66 | North Mankato, MN | 14,238 | 37.4 | 35.0% | 31.5% |
67 | New Ulm, MN | 14,055 | 38.9 | 36.0% | 25.1% |
68 | Ramsey, MN | 27,774 | 36.9 | 38.0% | 35.6% |
69 | Lakeville, MN | 70,696 | 36.5 | 33.0% | 44.3% |
70 | Buffalo, MN | 16,288 | 39.2 | 37.0% | 33.5% |
71 | Elk River, MN | 25,936 | 35.7 | 33.0% | 36.1% |
72 | Shoreview, MN | 26,846 | 45.2 | 32.0% | 26.0% |
73 | Champlin, MN | 23,666 | 41.3 | 35.0% | 32.9% |
74 | Fergus Falls, MN | 14,108 | 42.0 | 27.0% | 20.1% |
75 | Maple Grove, MN | 70,110 | 40.6 | 31.0% | 34.9% |
76 | Vadnais Heights, MN | 12,864 | 40.8 | 34.0% | 25.9% |
77 | Savage, MN | 32,441 | 37.5 | 30.0% | 39.1% |
78 | Inver Grove Heights, MN | 35,673 | 41.4 | 33.0% | 29.1% |
79 | East Bethel, MN | 11,901 | 40.3 | 48.0% | 28.4% |
80 | Prior Lake, MN | 27,608 | 39.4 | 34.0% | 40.0% |
81 | Cottage Grove, MN | 39,274 | 36.8 | 37.0% | 41.6% |
82 | Hastings, MN | 22,063 | 42.3 | 34.0% | 28.9% |
83 | Cloquet, MN | 12,559 | 35.5 | 29.0% | 32.5% |
84 | Andover, MN | 32,639 | 39.3 | 42.0% | 42.1% |
85 | Otsego, MN | 20,455 | 34.6 | 41.0% | 45.4% |
86 | Chaska, MN | 27,764 | 37.2 | 33.0% | 38.1% |
87 | Rosemount, MN | 25,993 | 37.8 | 36.0% | 41.0% |
88 | Rogers, MN | 13,283 | 37.2 | 45.0% | 50.9% |
89 | Grand Rapids, MN | 11,158 | 43.2 | 31.0% | 23.9% |
90 | Lake Elmo, MN | 11,861 | 40.9 | 37.0% | 38.7% |
91 | Forest Lake, MN | 20,553 | 37.9 | 37.0% | 31.0% |
92 | Mendota Heights, MN | 11,642 | 47.0 | 37.0% | 28.2% |
93 | Victoria, MN | 10,681 | 39.4 | 33.0% | 43.4% |
94 | Hermantown, MN | 10,135 | 38.0 | 40.0% | 40.5% |
95 | North Branch, MN | 10,968 | 39.9 | 42.0% | 30.9% |
96 | Hugo, MN | 15,831 | 38.6 | 45.0% | 31.4% |
97 | St. Michael, MN | 18,648 | 35.7 | 41.0% | 46.2% |
98 | Lino Lakes, MN | 21,525 | 42.4 | 44.0% | 32.0% |
99 | Ham Lake, MN | 16,489 | 42.9 | 48.0% | 34.1% |